Richard Burns
- Year called:
- 1969
- Email:
- richardburns@ropewalk.co.uk
- Qualifications:
- LLB, University of Bristol.
- Practice areas:
- Personal Injury, Clinical Negligence, Disease, Fraudulent Claims, Regulatory, Local Government
Richard Burns was called to the Bar in 1969.
He sits as a Recorder on the Midland Circuit.
He specialises in personal injury, clinical negligence, disease, fraudulent claims, regulatory and local government claims.
Personal Injury
He undertakes a wide range of cases ranging from straightforward RTA’s to catastrophic injury, fatal accident and other high value claims for both Claimants and Defendants.
He has found that most of the major claims he is instructed in for whichever side, are able to be settled successfully with his assistance by round table negotiations taking place early in the litigation or even ahead of proceedings being commenced. This usually results in a considerable saving of time and costs, to the benefit of all the parties. In the past few years he has been involved in numerous successful negotiations of this kind.
He was among the pioneers of computerisation at the Bar and has a thorough knowledge of IT systems. His experience allows him to work very flexibly away from Chambers at evenings and weekends to meet tight deadlines for the return of advices and pleadings.
He prides himself on his practicality and approachability and has a thorough knowledge of the procedural aspects of litigation. He specialises in producing schedules and counter schedules of loss in ‘Excel’, an extremely flexible spreadsheet format which has proved to be a very effective method of presenting quantum in complicated cases in a clear and judge friendly manner.
As an owner and breeder of horses and dogs, he has a special interest in claims under the Animals Act 1971. These have included horse riding accidents, attacks by dogs, injuries to stable staff and agricultural workers and collisions caused by livestock straying onto the highway.
To give an example of his present case load, he acted for a child who was born with cerebral palsy after her mother was involved in a RTA. Liability was never in issue but causation was very problematical because the mother suffered only minor injuries. However with his assistance, the correct experts were obtained who were satisfied that the injury had been the result of a placental abruption. Liability and causation were eventually admitted and an interim payment of £¾ million obtained. The case was subsequently settled by a one off payment of £8 million.
Reported cases include: CA: Worsfold v Howe [1980] 1 W.L.R.1175 (car emerging onto major road; whether entitled to inch forward though vision blocked) and most recently Smith v Nottingham Police [2011] (appeal against finding of 75% contributory negligence against a young woman pedestrian) and HL: Longden v British Coal [1998] A.C. 653 (occupational pensions; incapacity pension paid from contributory scheme; calculation of damages in respect of pension loss).
Clinical Negligence
Since joining Ropewalk Chambers he has developed an extensive clinical negligence practice.
He formerly acted mainly for Defendants but in the last ten years he has acted almost exclusively for Claimants in a wide range of clinical negligence claims.
Examples of cases where he has assisted Claimants to obtain substantial six and seven figure awards are for a child born with severely handicapped with cerebral palsy as a result of the failure of a hospital trust to detect that it was suffering from hypoxia during mother’s labour; a man who was rendered blind following the failure of a hospital trust to diagnose giant cell arteritis; a young woman who was wrongly told she did not have cervical cancer and a Fatal Accidents Act claim arising out of the death of a woman whose GP failed in time to diagnose a perforated duodenal ulcer.
At the other end of the scale of severity in terms of damages amongst many cases he has acted for a baby accidentally lacerated whilst being delivered by caesarean section and for a boy who obtained damages following the failure of his treating doctor to diagnose a testicular torsion in time to preserve a testicle.
Disease
He has over twenty years experience of occupational or insidious diseases such as asbestosis, mesothelioma, asthma, noise-induced hearing loss, hand/arm vibration syndrome and other work-related upper limb disorders and workplace stress.
His practice was formerly heavily weighted towards employers, particularly in the area of noise induced hearing loss. However, in recent years he has more frequently been instructed for Claimants. The vast majority of his cases for claimants have settled and in most of these cases he was closely involved in the antecedent negotiations.
An example of a substantial case he has recently been involved in concerned a works manager employed by a large food manufacturer who had sued his employers for work place stress. An admission was made and withdrawn prior to the coming into force of CPR 14(1)A and a judgment had been obtained in default of the service of a defence. Applications by the defence initially to set the judgment aside and latterly to adduce evidence of causation, were unsuccessful and the claim was settled by a round table negotiation for a substantial six figure sum.
Fraudulent Claims
Many of the claims that he deals with for Defendants in his personal injury practice involve an element of “fraud” in some shape or form.
These cases require careful analysis, an attention to detail and a ‘feel’ for dishonesty gained in the course of almost twenty years in criminal practice where he regularly handled major fraud cases as a Grade 4 Prosecutor.
Regulatory
He came to Nottingham in the late 1980’s as an established advocate in the Magistrates and Crown Courts having been a Grade 4 Prosecutor with a heavy criminal practice. His experience of the criminal courts gave him the expertise to undertake regulatory work and for over twenty years he has been regularly instructed in Health and Safety cases, mainly arising out of breaches by companies of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and associated health and safety regulations which have resulted in deaths and serious injuries in factories and farms and on construction sites. He is frequently called upon to draft Friskies schedules and asked to negotiate on plea with prosecution authorities.
Recent examples of difficult and sensitive cases he has dealt with in this area of his practice are his defence of a company of builders in the Crown Court who had been unexpectedly committed for sentence by the magistrates after pleaded guilty to a breach of the Construction Regulations (following an injury suffered by a child trespassing on one of their building sites); defending a large supermarket chain charged with allowing the underage sale of alcohol and mitigating for an international chemical company who had been prosecuted following an explosion at their works which created a cloud of toxic gas and led to the temporary closure of an adjacent motorway.
Local Government
He has regularly acted as an advocate for local authorities in planning enquiries and enforcement proceedings in the Magistrates and Crown courts.
He is able to offer knowledgeable and practical advice to local authorities who instruct him on a wide variety of licensing problems because he was a pupil to one of the leading licensing practitioners at the Bar and he has subsequently practised for over thirty years mainly in the area of liquor and gaming licensing. He has maintained a keen and critical interest in the passage and subsequent implementation of the Licensing Act 2003.
Recent examples of his case load are advices to borough councils on the interpretation of the legislation dealing with the licensing of Hackney carriages and private hire vehicles and on the danger and nuisance to local residents from dog fouling of roads parks and other open spaces and advice and acting as an advocate for a borough council on an appeal by a brewery company against their revocation of a premises licence for a public house.
He is an Assistant Boundary Commissioner for the Boundary Commission for England and in their latest (5th) Review he has reported on for them on the Lancashire Parliamentary constituencies.
Reported cases in this profile include McCool v Rushcliffe Borough Council [1998] 3 All E.R. 889 Divisional Court (a fit and proper person to be granted a taxi licence).
General
Interests away from the Bar include small scale farming, breeding Bernese Mountain dogs and American Quarter Horses (former Chairman of the American Quarter Horse Association UK).
Professional Membership
Personal Injuries Bar Association.
Professional Negligence Bar Association.
Nottinghamshire Medico-Legal Society.
Reported cases
Longden v British Coal [1998] A.C. 653 (occupational pensions).
McCool v Rushcliffe Borough Council [1998] 3 All E.R. 889 Divisional Court (taxi licensing).
Worsfold v Howe [1980] 1 W.L.R.1175 (RTA).



