Skip to content
Ropewalk - Law firm

Richard Seabrook

Call: 1987

"He has an astute legal brain and is always quick to grasp the issues."

Legal 500

Richard is now enjoying his 30th year at the Bar.

After conducting a broad mix of work with a strong criminal/common law focus in his early years, he developed a practice specialising in personal injury and associated areas. Richard was first appointed to the Attorney General’s Panel of Counsel in 1994, being selectively re-appointed ever since. He is experienced in all types of personal injury and fatal accident claims, and has been doing an increasing amount of clinical negligence and inquest work as detailed below.

His interests away from work include off-piste/big mountain skiing, rugby, cycling up and down mountains, gardening, travel, fine food and wine and a wide variety of types of loud music. He has not yet given up on the idea of attending a music festival, albeit perhaps one with glamping! Married to Jane, a musculoskeletal physiotherapist, he has three grown (and growing) up children, none of whom are showing the slightest inclination to be mad enough to consider a career at the Bar.

Personal Injury

Personal injury work has been the most significant component of Richard’s practice since his call to the Bar.

Acting for both Claimants and Defendants, he has gained considerable experience of all stages of the full range of personal injury claims, including fatal accidents, serious traumatic injury and occupational disease claims.

His practice affords him a wealth of experience of conducting personal injury litigation from pre-issue, through to conducting appeals in the Court of Appeal. The range of work undertaken by Richard covers all types of personal injury claim litigated on the Multi Track. He undertakes advisory work in respect of all aspects of breach, causation, limitation, quantum, tactics and evidence, conducts conferences with relevant experts, attends interlocutory hearings and conducts trials and appeals. Joint Settlement Meetings are a frequent entry in his diary.

He has been appointed as counsel on the Attorney General’s Panel in respect of personal injury work since 1994. He has acted for most Government Departments and agencies over the years. However he also acts against them, with some insight into their workings.

Catastrophic Injury

Richard is routinely instructed in a range of catastrophic injuries arising from his motor, traumatic, employers’ and public liability and clinical negligence work. He is confident and experienced in assisting in the identification and recruitment of the appropriate range of experts to ensure that all aspects of the injury are addressed. He is used to advising on the types of issue which commonly arise including those relating to capacity, accommodation, prosthetics, Court of Protection and periodical payments. He is currently advising in relation to several traumatic brain injury claims.

Clinical Negligence

Richard’s clinical negligence work continues to increase in amount, complexity and value. He acts predominantly for Claimants, but is also instructed by the MDU and NHSR. He is keen to expand this area of practice.

The litigation he has had experience of conducting include deaths and injury, including significant brain injury, resulting from inadequate medical attention, poor surgical practice, failure to administer appropriate medical treatment and systemic failure.

He has dealt with a very wide range of areas of medical practice, including orthopaedics, oncology, general practitioner practice, dentistry, ophthalmic, obstetrics and gynaecology, accident and emergency and plastic surgery. He has dealt with claims, to name but a few, relating to failed hip replacement surgery, failure to diagnose diabetic retinopathy, failed breast enlargement surgery, death resulting from failure to recognise the progression of hereditary angeodema and negligently conducted hysterectomies, amongst many others.


Occupational disease work is a significant aspect of the personal injury work conducted by Richard. He has obtained very considerable experience of all aspects of this type of work since he moved to Ropewalk Chambers more than 20 years ago.

He has enormous experience in all types of disease litigation, including defending group actions, to Appellate level. His practice encompassed the range of work from serious NIHL claims, to work-related upper limb disorders, chest diseases, asbestos-related and stress at work claims.

Counter Fraud

Fraudulent claims come in a variety of shapes and sizes, from outright invention of an accident / injury through to the more subtle deliberate exaggeration of legitimate heads of damage.

Richard’s initial ten years of practice, involving a significant element of Crown Court criminal work before moving to Ropewalk Chambers, makes him particularly well-placed to explore these types of claim. Cross-examination of Claimants thought to be pursuing fraudulent claims is, for him, an area of particular interest and professional reward.

Whilst aware of the recognition by courts of chronic pain, ME, fibromyalgia, somatoform disorders and the like, Richard is well able to probe into the divide between the genuine and the fraudulent.

Criminal Regulatory

Richard has much experience in defending and mitigating on Health and Safety prosecutions arising out of work-related personal injury and death. His experience of criminal law and procedure ensures a multi-disciplinary approach is brought to bear, when seeking the most favourable outcome for his clients.


So far as inquest work is concerned, he has considerable experience in representing a wide range of “interested persons”, including the family of the deceased, albeit is more commonly is instructed by those whose conduct is being critically enquired in to. He is very experienced in conducting both “Coroner only” and “Coroner with jury” type inquests and in those engaging Article 2 HRA.

He regularly attends pre-inquest review hearings, complex multi-party inquests lasting up to six weeks, and inquests where criminal charges against witnesses / organisations are still under consideration.

He is well used to dealing with the quasi-criminal nature attaching to some inquest hearings, the robust approach of some representatives and Coroners, as well as the peculiar sensitivities that will always arise. He is also instructed to advise clients on all aspects of inquest hearing and preparation and regularly holds conferences with proposed inquest witnesses.

He is regularly instructed as counsel on the Attorney General’s Panel, acting for Government Departments at jury inquests.


Claims arising out of road traffic accidents have been a significant aspect of Richard’s practice over very many years. These claims have touched on almost every legal scenario, and include claims involving the Motor Insurers’ Bureau’s untraced and uninsured driver’s agreements, insurance / cover issues, fraudulent claims, catastrophic injury and multiple party claims. By way of example, Richard currently acts for an uninsured, under-age motor cycle rider who was in a head-on collision with a bus, suffering life changing injuries, and recently obtained a very satisfactory settlement (for one of the Defendants) of a substantial claim brought against the MOD and a farmer after a military vehicle left a muddy country road causing serious injury to multiple passengers.

Group Actions

Over many years, Richard has had involvement in both bringing and defending group actions, most recently being involved in two occupation disease based action brought against a North East based mining group. He is not concerned by having to digest the volume of material usually involved in such cases and is adept at creating helpful tables and spreadsheets which assimilate pertinent aspects of the evidence.



  • Attorney General’s Panel Counsel


  • Action Against Medical Accidents
  • Personal Injuries Bar Association


  • LLB (Hons) 2:1, Manchester

Notable Cases

  • Joseph Johnson v Ministry of Defence and Hobourn Eaton [2012] EWCA Civ 1505
  • Hartman v South Essex Mental Health NHS Trust & Others [2005] EWCA Civ 6
  • Holtby v Brigham & Cowan (Hull) Limited (2000) 3 All ER 421


“A good advocate, who can pitch his arguments at the right level.”
Legal 500 2017 – Personal injury and clinical negligence

“He has an astute legal brain.”
Legal 500 2017 – Inquest and inquiries

Barrister of the Year – Nottinghamshire Law Society 2017

“He has an astute legal brain and is always quick to grasp the issues.”
Legal 500 2016 – Personal injury and clinical negligence

“Richard Seabrook is particularly experienced in deaths in custody matters.” “Has very good client care skills.”
Legal 500 2016 – Regulatory, health and safety and licensing

“Represents Claimants and Defendants in a wide range of personal injury cases.”
Legal 500 2015 – Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence

“An extremely effective junior.”
Legal 500 2015 – Personal injury and clinical negligence

For further information please contact our clerks on:

+44 (0) 115 947 2581


Postal address:
Ropewalk Chambers
24, The Ropewalk,
Nottingham, NG1 5EF.

Telephone: +44 (0) 115 947 2581

Fax: +44 (0) 115 947 6532

Document Exchange:
DX: 10060 Nottingham 17


Opening hours: 8:00am to 6:00pm

Out of hours:
Tony Hill – 07850 086097
Alan Odiam – 07771 603929

Portfolio Builder


Select the Expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download Add to portfolio
Portfolio close
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to email this list of to a colleague.