14 July 2021 - Written by Nikhil Arora
In King v Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust  EWHC 1576 (QB), the High Court once again demonstrated the difficulties faced by Claimants who suffer psychiatric condi...
In Meadows v Khan  UKSC 21, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed Ms Meadows' appeal, finding that there was no principled basis for excluding a clinical negligence claim from the ambit of the 'scope of duty principle' in the tort of negligence. The j...
11 May 2021 - Written by Richard Seabrook
Imagine the following scenario. A patient, known to have mental health issues, has been consenting to a proposed or potential course of medical treatment. Then, as the need to embark on that treatment crystalizes and becomes urgent, consent is withdrawn. The treatment...
29 April 2021 - Written by Patrick Limb QC
Cauda equina syndrome is a rare and severe type of spinal stenosis. A narrowing of the spinal canal causes the nerves in the lower back to become severely compressed. Typically, but not exclusively, it results from a prolapsed disc bulge. The condition requires urgent...
20 April 2021 - Written by Cassandra Williams
The law requires medical practitioners to use diligence, care, knowledge, skill and caution in administering treatment to a patient. The question of whether a medical practitioner has met the requisite standard of care is often considered by reference to the test laid...
12 April 2021 - Written by Edward James
In Negus v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust  EWHC 643 (QB), the High Court considered whether an NHS Trust was...
1 April 2021 - Written by Thomas Herbert
Thomas Herbert's article on Lambert J's decision in Toombes v Mitchell  EWHC 3506 (QB), which considered the correct interpretation of section 1 of the Congenital D...
The topic of consent has been increasingly contentious since the Supreme Court’s decision in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board  AC 1430, which shifted the focus from Bolam-style clinical paternalism to patient autonomy. ...
25 February 2021 - Written by Philip Godfrey
In Jarman v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust  EWHC 323 (QB), the Claimant brought a claim against the Defendant hospital for failing to promptly diagnose Cauda Equina Syndrome ("CES"). This case is of note for two reasons: ...
Revisiting the Test of Material Contribution in Clinical Negligence Claims following Davies v Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
In Davies v Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust  EWHC 169 (QB), the High Court considered the question of causation in circumstances where the deceased had suffered from acute pneu...
19 February 2021 - Written by Cassandra Williams
In Brint v Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust  EWHC 290 (QB), HHJ Platts, sitting as a High Court Judge, declined to make a finding of fundamental ...
17 February 2021 - Written by Philip Godfrey
In Hopkins v (1) Akramy (2) Badger Group (3) NHS Commissioning Board  EWHC 3445 (QB), the High Court considered, as a preliminary issue, whether an NHS Primary Care Trust ("P...
8 February 2021 - Written by Gareth McAloon
'Seconds Out!': Secondary Victim Claims Arising from Clinical Negligence to go to the Court of Appeal
Claims by secondary victims arising from clinical negligence have for many years been a battleground between Claimants and the NHS, particularly where the psychiatric damage that is the subject of the claim occurs many months after the purported breach of duty in...
26 January 2021 - Written by Shilpa Shah
Whilst clinical negligence practitioners are especially accomplished in ensuring that they properly advise their clients to claim an interim payment on account of damages when this best suits their client’s needs, the opportunity of seeking an interim payment on...
18 January 2021 - Written by Jason Cox
Clinical negligence cases can be complex enough without the added difficulty of delay in bringing proceedings resulting in a limitation defence. When it is raised by Defendants it is currently common for cases to be managed so that limitation will be tried as a prelim...
28 October 2020 - Written by Christopher Lowe
In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board  1 AC 1430, the Supreme Court held that "[t]he doctor is ... under a duty to take reasonable care to ensure that the patient is aware of any material risks involved in any recommended treatment, and...
19 August 2020 - Written by Patrick Limb QC
Travel back seven decades: the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 was given Royal Assent on 15 June 1945; three years later, on 5 July 1948, the NHS was founded. At the level of principle, the statute effected a radical ...
30 June 2020 - Written by Cassandra Williams
In the context of clinical negligence cases, causation can be just as tricky to establish as breach, perhaps even more so. The difficulties arise in part because many of these cases involve Claimants who were injured or ill before seeking the treatment or advice that ...
21 April 2020 - Written by Thomas Herbert
It is well-known that, in principle, the costs of an inquest are recoverable in a subsequent clinical negligence claim. The leading case in this regard, also well-known, is Roach v Home Office  QB 256. Ever...
For many years we have acted in cases across the spectrum of clinical negligence litigation, ranging from smaller claims arising from dental treatment and minor cosmetic surgery to the most serious cases of birth and catastrophic injury and fatality. The depth of experience in our Clinical Negligence Team allows us to meet all levels of requirement.
Our barristers are highly experienced in group and multi-party actions across a range of clinical negligence and product liability claims.
Sadly, some medical errors result in the death of the patient and we are able to provide expertise in advising and representation at inquests and in subsequent civil claims for damages.
To find out more about our Clinical Negligence barristers, click here.
Search blog by title or barrister
Subscribe for blog updates
Search by keyword
- Breach of Duty
- Cauda Equina Syndrome
- Contributory Negligence
- Duty of care
- Expert Evidence
- Fatal Accidents
- Good Medical Practice
- Mental Capacity
- Non-delegable duties
- Scope of duty
- Secondary victims
- Wrongful birth
- Secondary Victims: Still Second-Class Claimants?
- Meadows v Khan in the Supreme Court: Scope of Duty in Clinical Negligence Claims
- Considerations of Consent, Capacity and Best Interests