Author(s)
Last week HM Senior Coroner John Gittins found that the death of former international footballer, Alan Jarvis, was caused by his participation in professional sport.
During the 1960s and 1970s, Mr Jarvis played for Everton, Hull City and Mansfield Town, as well as securing international caps for Wales. He died in 2019 from Alzheimer’s disease, having repeatedly headed footballs during his career.
The conclusion is the second known of its kind in the UK. In 2002, an inquest into the death of former England and West Bromwich Albion footballer, Jeff Astle, found that Mr Astle developed dementia as a result of his occupation, having spent years heading heavy leather footballs. The conclusion also coincides with an increase in research being conducted into the incidence of neurodegenerative disease in professional sport. One such study was recently led by the University of Glasgow in 2019 and funded by the Professional Footballers’ Association Charity and Football Association. It concluded that the rate of death due to neurodegenerative disease was approximately 3.5 times higher amongst former professional footballers when compared to the average person, including a 5 times higher rate of incidence of Alzheimer’s disease.
Overall, the conclusion as to the cause of Mr Jarvis’s death could pave the way for professional athletes (or families on their behalf) to claim compensation for industrial disease after sustaining head injuries during their career.
On 10 April 2024, the High Court handed down its decision in Williams-Henry v Associated British Ports Holdings Ltd [2024] EWHC 806 (KB). In that judgment the presentation of the Claimant’s claim for personal injury was considered fundamentally dishonest and so was dismissed under section 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 (“the 2015 Act”). In considering whether…
After the introduction of the reforms to the Civil Procedure Rules in 2013, you may recall some judges becoming, at least initially, excited about the prospect of experts giving evidence concurrently (so-called “hot tubbing”). Since that early flush of excitement, I have been involved in only one trial in which it was used and I…
Provisional damages operate as an exception to the general rule that damages are assessed on a once-and-for-all basis. Where a claimant finds themselves at a risk of developing a disease or deterioration in their physical or mental condition in the future, the general rule would require the court to assess that risk and compensate the…
